[OpendTect_Users] Question
Crepin Eric Bouanga
eric.bouanga at dgbes.com
Thu May 12 12:19:01 CEST 2011
Dear Dan,
> I have a question about working with 2-d horizons when you have
> several 2-d lines in a survey. Should I use the same horizon name on
> each line when tracking the horizon? When I do this, I see all the
> lines that I have traced in the 3-d scene which can be a little
> confusing if not displaying all the seismic lines at once. But, if I
> use a different name for each line can I then derive a 3-d horizon
> from the 2-d horizons?
>
You can of course use different 2d horizon name for each line, but if
you want to convert these lines (which have the same geological meaning,
i.e. same tracking event) to 3d horizon it is then better to have one 2d
horizon for all lines. If you are confused to see them all, just use the
option "display only at section" (2d horizon > right-click >display only
at section).
As soon as a 2D horizon (one name) is tracked, a 3D horizon can be
derived by right-clicking the 2D horizon in the tree and choose /Derive
3D horizon./
A window pops up in which you can select the algorithm (inverse distance
interpolation, triangulation, GMT). The results can be displayed
immediately by selecting the /Display after generation/ option.
For more detailed information on 2d horizon and conversion to 3d, please
see the links below:
http://opendtect.org/rel/doc/User/base/chapter4.7_2d_horizon.htm#LINK-TREE.2D.HORIZON
http://opendtect.org/rel/doc/User/base/chapter4.6_horizon.htm#LINK-TREE.HORIZON.ALGO
Best regards,
Eric
--
/*
Eric Bouanga, MSc.
Geoscientist
dGB Earth Sciences B.V.
Nijverheidstraat 11-2, 7511 JM Enschede, The Netherlands
Mailto: eric.bouanga at dgbes.com
Tel: +31 534315155 / Fax: +31 534315104
http://www.dgbes.com
Skype: ericb_dgb
*/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opendtect.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110512/8999388a/attachment.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list